Take the Lead is a harmless little film with an abundance of energy, and somewhat to my surprise, I actually kind of enjoyed it. Maybe it was because I was tired during the screening or possibly it was because Akeelah and the Bee left such a bad gustation in my mouth. Or maybe its just because the film is what it is and doesnt really hear to be anything more than.

Taking a cue from the late documentary Mad Hot Ballroom as well as Stand and Deliver, Dirty Terpsichore and (good God am I actually saying this?) You Got Served, Ingest the Principal features Antonio Banderas as Pierre Dulaine, a easily intentioned dance palace dance instructor who takes it upon himself to lend his services to a mathematical group of troubled urban highschool schoolers wHO constantly happen themselves in detention. At first, the underachievers see Dulaines flair of dancing laughable and a bit fruity, simply they soon discover its true spell and even begin fusing ballroom moves with their Hip Hop chops. Along the way, Dulaine and the students develop something of a grudging respect for unmatched another that eventually forges a hamper - word.

The plot of land sounds generic, and for the almost part, it is. What elevates the film is the likability factor. Banderas is extremely charming, and he as well proves to be a hell of a dancer. Alfre Woodard (doing a sort of Crazy Joe impersonation) is tough and spunky as a high school principle. Rob Brown (who made a magnetic debut in Gus Van Sants Finding Forrester) is perfectly unpretentious as a young man trying to steer sort out of the gangster life-time even though his ire often gets the better of him. Yaya Dacosta is strong as a vulnerable high gear school bookman with an extremely unstable home animation. The rest of the cast is surprisingly effective despite their one dimensional roles - each histrion gets to bring a little scrap of their own personality to the floor gift guys like the goof Dante Basco a probability to showboat.

Take the Lead was directed by Liz Friedlander who made a name for herself by running on euphony videos for the likes of R.E.M. and Wink 182. With her plastic film debut, she keeps things relatively light-colored (save for a couple of acute sub plots - including Yayas aforementioned home life scenario), and even though this flick is predictable, the cast provides sufficiency charisma and charm to overshadow it.

The inevitable climax, in which the poor urban high schoolers take on the rich kids in a big ballroom competition isnt peculiarly original, but I did like the fact that these kids dont turn into dance palace dancing geniuses. Friedlander does keep things in control. Its too bad she couldnt keep her editors in checker. The frenzied cutting style really began to devil me. I can translate the excessive cutting used in some sequences. Such editing is often victimized to hide the deficiencies of some of the dancers - but Banderas "can" dance and has proven it in other films (Mambo Kings and his hilarious ferment in IV Rooms). I wish his dance scenes would get been cut differently. In fact, I wish they wouldnt have been cut at all. If anything, it gives the picture that he "cant" dance.

Having said that, Take the Lead is solid entertainment. It isnt exactly authoritative cinema, just Ill take it over garbage like Shall We Dance whatsoever day of the Calendar week.

I to a fault was surprised by this film, it really sour out to be a heartwarming have and the kids were all quite believable and able to deliver their comedic lines with ripe timing.

I cant believe this is getting a rotten tomatoe, the photographic film accomplishes everything it tries to accomplish, its not pretentious , it doesnt over reach - i dont understand why critics would have a poblem with it? What do they want egg in their beer?

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

Another year has terminated and once again, critics and motion-picture show fans likewise have put together their lists of favorites for 2003. Im certainly no different as Ive through this for the last decade or so myself. While I did hit over one hundred fifty films this year, in that location are plenteousness of notable pictures that I was unable to see for a number of reasons. Titles like Big Fish, Stevie, Adult male Without a Past, A Decade Under the Influence, Spellbound, Swimming Pool, The Magdalene Sisters, Secret Lives of Dentists, Dummy, Veronica Guerin, Elephant, The Human Stain, Shattered Glass, Love Actually, Tupac: Ressurection, All the Pretty Girls, Triplets of Belleville, Girl With a Pearl Earring, The Fog of War, Theater of Sand and Fog, Monster, The Company, and Man on the Train have all received high marks from various sources but I have yet to see them. A year seems like a long time, but with so many movies and a normal life to lead, its hard to see them all. In fact, Im sure on that point are plausibly several other titles I failed to mention, merely I think I remembered the major ones. At any rate, here ar my personal favorite cinema experiences of 2003. (Starting at 40 and working my way to issue 1.)

40. OPEN Range<br />After The Postman, I didnt know if Kevin Costner was capable of making a welcome recall to the directing scene of action. Thankfully, he carried it off with the patient, old fashioned western Receptive Range. Costner the player is pretty boring here, but Costner the director does a fantastic job creating a picture perfect western punctuated by one spectacular shootout. While Open Range for certain smacks of Unforgiven, it is a terrific celluloid thanks to restrained direction and some other terrific performance by Henry M. Robert Duvall.

39. BAD St. Nick<br />While unrefined and downright vile, Bad Santa clay quite odd. Billy Bob Thornton is a screaming as a department fund Santa wHO absolutely loathes the holidays. Director Terry cloth Zwigoff (Ghost World) has a simple goal; put the jolly boat old buster in as many compromising, disgusting situations as humanly possible. He succeeded. And even though the movie tends to be a tad besides obscene, like all corking holiday movies, it provides some mettle as well.

38. PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN: Bane OF THE BLACK Pearl<br />This remove on the famed Disneyland attraction suffers from to a fault long steel fights and a ho-hum length, merely its stunning to front at and features a brilliant turn by Greyback Depp wHO brings to life one of the most physically entertaining pirates you will ever see in the movies. I wonder if Keith I. A. Richards enjoyed it as much as the rest of us did?

37. Spider<br />Director Jacques Louis David Cronenberg is an acquired taste, but its one that Ive grown to love. This psychological thriller features Ralph Fiennes as one mad individual. Few movies have managed to tap into the mind of a killer in the fashion that this picture does. Slow and methodical, Spider is besides compelling and well acted.

36. PIECES OF April<br />This short seen gem made a sizable splash at Sundance 2003. The warm and fuzzy yet brutally honest family drama features Katie Holmes as a offspring woman preparing a Grace dinner for her estranged family. Everything that could possibly go wrong does in this insightful dramady from the screenwriter of Whats Feeding Gilbert Grapevine.

35. Dark BLUE<br />I never would have guessed that Daffo Shelton (the director in arrears sports themed movies care Bull Durham and Tin Cup) could be capable of such a gritty film. Drear Blue stars Kurt Ken Russell as a flawed snitch who gets in o’er his head. This Training Day-esque drama is jell to the back drop of the Rodney King inspired L.A. riots.

34. OWNING MAHOWNY<br />Philip Seymour Malvina Hoffman gives one of his very best performances as a gentleman consumed by a horrid gambling dependency. While well written, this is a movie or so great performing and Malvina Hoffman carries the picture with a attractively textured turn.

33. Curve IT Like BECKHAM<br />Like last years My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Bend it Wish Beckham is simplistic and charming in its picture of a young woman trying to break out of generations of tradition. Parminder K. Nagra is a please as the lead, a soccer player with aspirations of expiration professional in spite of her parents wishes.

32. IDENTITY<br />James Mangolds inventive take on Ten Little Indians is a well crafted whodunit with a nifty twist. Since The Sixth Common sense, most thrillers are hell-bent on blowing the audience away with an unexpected twist. The one here really works. Its wish a really good Twilight Zone sequence. John Cusack is perfect in the lead, only its Mangolds taut direction and the stunning filming and redaction that make this thriller work.

31. MATCHSTICK Workforce<br />Ridely Dred Scott switched gears from displaying the horrors of war (Gladiator and Blackhawk Depressed), by sledding light with this tremendous character discipline, a sorting of contemporary version of Paper Moon in which Nicolas Cage plays a con man who decides to show his loretta Young, estranged daughter (a fantastical Alison Lohman) the ropes. Ive heard many griping about the ending, only it didnt bother me. I loved the father/daughter relationship that blossoms in this film.

30. BUBBA HO-TEP<br />Unitary of the most eccentric films in recent retention is also one of the funniest pictures of 2003. Religious cult icon Sir David Bruce Campbell (the Evil Dead series) plays an senescence Elvis wHO, with the help of an ageing John F. Kennedy (played by Ossie Davis…yes, that Ossie Davis), does battle with an ancient Egyptian force thats picking off former folk at a TX retirement home. Nothing in this moving picture should work, but everything does thanks to creative performances and a high-octane direction from Don Coscarelli (Phantasm).

29. MAY<br />This dark comedy/horror film has elements of Heathers and nearly every horror flick you can shake a stick at. Angela Bettis is creepily effective as a indrawn young woman with ugly social skills. She gets most of her advice from an inanimate target (a strange looking doll). This inventive look at dealing with alienation takes a blood soaked plough for the worst as Bettis decides to make the perfect friend since she is unable to find one.

28. Shape OF Things<br />Neil LaBute is one of my favorite writers of the last ten years. With deft perceptivity into the dark side of human nature displayed in pictures like In the Party of Men and Your Friends and Neighbors, LaBute has fashioned some of the most despicable characters in recent memory. Following departures Nurse Betty and Possession, LaBute returns to the morose side with this screen adaptation of his have play. Its the story of a shy college man (toppingly played by Paul Scardinius erythrophthalmus) who is transformed into a studhorse courtesy of fellow scholar Rachel Weisz. The termination of this picture is nauseating merely all overly truthful.

27. COLD Mountain<br />Cold Great deal is a curiously odd film. Its a motion picture I admired more than I liked. Anthony Minghellas Civil War era drama is gorgeous to look at and features prominent acting from the likes of Jude Law, Nicole Kidman, Brendan Gleeson, Philip Seymour Malvina Hoffman, Natalie Portman, Kathy Baker and a scene stealth Rene Zellweger. While the movie does lack emotional depth, it is a visual looker. There are elements of Gone With the Current of air here merely ultimately, this is a retelling of the Odyssey set to the backdrop of the Civil Warfare.

26. 21 GRAMS<br />Director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu followed up his brilliant Amores Perros with this character study/morality tarradiddle in which three lives are profoundly altered by an awed car accident. The tale isnt told in a straight forward narrative making for a provocative film in which themes of guilt, score, and redemption are all deftly displayed. Sean William Penn, Benicio Del Toro and Naomi Isaac Watts are all outstanding in this flawed but compellingly challenging cinema.

25. Exterminator 3<br />Of all the high profile summer movies (i.e. the entertaining but overlong Pirates of the Caribbean and the disappointing Matrix Reloaded), Eradicator 3 was the most surprising. Disdain the going away of Eradicator creator James II Cameron, this entry managed to pay homage to past installments while furthering the story at the same fourth dimension. While non as ic as the first-class honours degree two films, director Jonathan Mostow and crew fashioned a blaze of a ride featuring one of the great car chases of all time, and one raw, grand ending. Its decent to see that Arnie can tranquil kick ass!

24. Terpsichorean UPSTAIRS<br />Actor John Malkovich made an impressive directorial debut with this involving political whodunit that substitutes predictable, Hollywood style thrills, with a patient, quality driven plot of ground, that pays off in a serial of unexpected but fulfilling ways. Javier Bardem is subtle in the lead, and on that point are a couple of moments in this picture that left my abdomen in knots.

23. A MIGHTY Wind<br />Christopher Guest (Waiting for Guffman, Best in Show) scores again, this time taking a satirical look at the world of folk music. Like his past offerings, most of A Mighty Wind is improvised and features familiar faces such as Prince Eugene of Savoy Levy, Catherine the Great OHara, Dorothy Rothschild Parker Posey and Fred Willard. Equally comic and witching, the films major kvetch comes in the descriptor of some truly elysian and original folk songs.

22. Helpless IN LA MANCHA<br />Dame Alice Ellen Terry Gilliam is one of our most underrated directors. With movies like Time Bandits, Brazil and The Adventures of Baron Karl Friedrich Hieronymus von Munchhausen under his belt, this filmmaker has made a career out of eccentric brilliance. Not long agone, Gilliam set out to shoot a new adaptation of The Man World Health Organization Killed Don River Quixote. Due to out of the blue disaster later on disaster, the film was never completed, but this documentary on the making of that movie, was. All at once insightful and improbably painful, this observant glance into the world of filmmaking makes you admiration how any picture e’er gets made.

21. School OF Rock<br />Raise your goblet to the laughable genius that is Manual laborer Black. After dazzling audiences with his scene stealth work in High Fidelity, Mr. Black is endorse front and center. School of Rock offers up a typical fish-out-of-water storyline, but Blacks high-energy performance and a hip homage to the world of rock make this a unique kinfolk comedy. Black, director Richard Linklater and crew feature created a movie that shows how vital it is that music programs remain in the school curriculum.

20. MASTER AND COMMANDER: Far SIDE OF THE Populace<br />Russell Crowe is a noble ship commander during the Napoleon era in this stunning achievement from director St. Peter Weir. Spell not emotionally involving, this movie is literate and breathtaking to look at. As I watched this picture, I could feel the isolation that these men must have matte. Paul Bettany is superb as the ship mD. Master and Commander is about the art of war in time when even children had to fight if they were to turn men.

19. THE Singing DETECTIVE<br />Robert Downey Jr. gave the performance of his life history (yes, better than Chaplin) in this offbeat, boastful screen adaptation of the BBC series of the same identify. Director Keith Gordon fuses several genres including celluloid noir, funniness, drama and the flick musical, to bring this strange, surreal world to life, and for me, it worked. I besides loved Mel Gibsons execution as a psychiatrist. Hes completely unrecognizable, and his scenes with Downey Jr. are outstanding.

18. THE COOLER<br />William H. Macy does what he does best in The Cooler; plays the lovable loser. Here, he plays a cooler, a mythical casino employee wHO can ruin the hottest of gamblers just by walking by them. Macys luck changes, however, when he becomes smitten with a cocktail waitress (played by the beautiful Maria Bello). Macy and Bello heat up the screen door, as does a scene stealing Alec Baldwin world Health Organization seems to be channeling his character from David Mamets Glengarry Glen Betsy Ross.

17. CAPTURING THE FRIEDMANS<br />Capturing the Firedmans is one of the most disturbing documentaries Ive of all time seen. Through home video footage and interviews, we are introduced to dysfunction head-on in the form of The Friedmans, a seemingly typical American fellowship. This familys life is torn apart when the head of the family, an solid teacher, is accused of child harassment. This documentary is all too frightening, and when it was all over, I couldnt tell if this man was free or shamed. This is compelling stuff.

16. Imp<br />Will Ferrell was an absolute please as a childlike extremely low frequency in what I imagine will be a holiday classic for years to come. His performance here brought to mind Tom Hanks in Big. Be kudos should go to director Jon Faverau for his lightsome touch. He was inspired by everything from those charming Rankin and Sea bass holiday specials (Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer) to Crocodile Dundee. This movie is light and breezy, just most of all, it gives you that warm and fuzzed feeling you want while watching a Christmas movie.

15. Old SCHOOL<br />What a year for Volition Ferrell. No doubt, many will think Im out of my mind for showering this movie with such extolment, but the fact of the topic is, I laughed all the way through it. It reminded me of Bachelor Party (a flick Ive had a sonant spot for years). Retention the picture together is the divine lunacy of Will Ferrell. I exactly look at this guy wire and I cant help oneself but crack up. Hes a natural and hell do anything for a laugh. This includes falling trou in one of the films funniest scenes. Yes, Previous School is offensive and immature, simply who cares. It made me gag.

14. MY FLESH AND BLOOD<br />I first adage this motion-picture show at Sundance Film Festival and it nearly moved me to tears. This intimate objective follows literal life hero Susan Tom, a woman who would go on to take on several special needs children. This movie has more shocking plot turns than many fictional films. Just while this documentary profiles these incredible children, it also profiles Susan Tom herself, a woman world Health Organization obviously has the void in her lonely heart filled by these grand kids. My Flesh and Bloods subject matter may seem like an easy way to move an audience, just this doesnt make it any less important. There are many definitions of a hero sandwich, and Susan Tom is one in my book.

13. 28 DAYS Afterwards<br />After beingness let down by the overhyped Cabin Fever, I feared that the horror genre would be dead this year. Thankfully, Trainspotting director Danny Boyle restored my faith with the virus eruption thriller 28 Days Later. While distinctly inspired by the George Romero living dead pictures, this horror film had a style all its have, and whats more, I actually cared about the characters in this moving picture. Boyle shot the intact flick in DV and boy does it look amazing. What I liked most around 28 Years Later, is its whole step. Early on, Boyle lets us have sex that this is a movie in which whatsoever character might be killed at whatever second. Along with May, this was my favourite horror photographic film of the year.

12. AMERICAN Lustre<br />Paul Giamatti gave one of the best performances of the year as social commentary cartoonist William Harvey Pekar in this hilarious and upbeat biopic. Pekar was quite the character and this picture captures him in all of his geek glory through Giamattis salient potrayal, and through genuine interviews with the real Pekar, which are intercut into the movie. Hope Davis is also outstanding as Pekars love interest. Some of my favorite moments in American Brilliancy involve Pekars meetings with another famous, eccentric cartoonist, Robert Crumb. This motion-picture show is a true original.

11. THE LAST Samurai<br />The Last Samurai english hawthorn be predictable, and it may resemble Dances With Wolves, Braveheart, Glory and the whole kit of Akira Kuroasawa, just who cares. This larger-than-life from Edward Zwick is absolutely breathtaking and features stunning cinematography picture pure art direction and great costume intent. It likewise features some beautifully choreographed sword fights that, spell bloody, ar incredibly poetic. They regular rival the ones in my number ten pick. It has been argued that Gobbler Cruise is too innovative in the role of an ex-civil war soldier whos been scarred by the horrors of warfare. I think his mold here is fantastic. This is an intense, heartfelt performance.

10. KILL Account VOLUME 1<br />Kill Account has been dismissed by many as nothing more than sadistic. I defend that this is possibly the charles Herbert Best commercial entertainment of the year. Quentin Tarantino is cinematic sponge and while this is my least favorite of his films in price of account content, it is probably his best looking picture. The brand fights here are wearying, and Uma Thurman is tough as nails in the ultimate chick force movie. Yes, this ruffle is ultra violent, only in a cartoonish way. And how about that soundtrack. Quentin Tarantino uses pieces of music here that you would never think would work, but they perfectly congratulate the imagery on screen. Volume 2 is slated to open on Feb. 20th. That just so happens to be my birthday. I cant think of a better demonstrate.

9. Mystic RIVER<br />With Mystic River, I consider Clint Eastwood has fashioned his c. H. Best film in terms of overall direction. Unforgiven is a genuinely good motion picture, but Mystic River is a bully one. Eastwood has carefully woven together a mystery about friendship, loyalty, buyback and dark secrets. Mystical River is also a film close to how a terrifying incident can non only supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe who individual is, simply who he will become. Sean Penn and Tim Robbins are extraordinary in this word-painting.

8. IN AMERICA<br />Director Jim Sheridan is topper known for his brilliant collaborations with Daniel Day-Lewis (see My Left Invertebrate foot and In the Name of the Father). He hasnt made a motion picture since The Boxer, and with In America, hes given us an internal, heartfelt story about an Irish folk struggling to make it in America. Paddy Considine and Samantha Morton are stellar hither, but it is the young, literal sister team of Sarah and Emma Bolger that will steal your heart with their innocence and honesty. In America manages to force the heartstrings without organism an all out sap-fest. This is a wonderful movie.

7. IRREVERSIBLE<br />Irreversible would have been the most controversial film of the year if more people had heard of it. I just noticed it on Entertainment Weeklys worst of list. Spell watching this movie, I can come across why so many have contempt for it, simply to me, the shocking and provocative Irreversible is one of those films that I cant shake out of my brain. While repulsive and misanthropic, it is unfair to call this picture unpointed. With audacious and brutal energy, film director Gaspar Noe dares you to look at a bleak reality, but at the same time, dares you to look away, and he does so in opposite (think Souvenir). Irreversible shows us, with grotesque, in-your-face fearlessness, how fragile life can be. This brainy movie isnt for the faint at heart, and certainly it isnt meant as entertainment value, only it is brilliant nonetheless.

6. Preoccupied IN Translation<br />I was not a fan of Sofia Coppolas Virgin Suicides, so I went into her new film Bemused in Displacement with scepticism. After this stunning movie was over, I was overwhelmed by Coppolas maturity from her first cinema to her second. Bill Murray gives the performance of his career and is assisted by a stunning Scarlett Johansson. I bought into this interesting, heartfelt relationship, and admired the way Coppola uses Japan as a third gear character. In the closing, Lost in Translation proves that a whisper is worth more than a thousand words.

5. Heavyweight RIDER<br />This majestic mob drama is a entrancing look into tradition, an unfamiliar culture (to me anyway), and womans rights all set to the backdrop of a breathless New Sjaelland landscape. Whale Rider features a brilliant performance by young Keisha Castle-Hughes as a girl who urgently wants to earn the respect of her previous fashioned granddad. Try as she mightiness, she angers him more than than she pleases, as she sets out to change his way of thinking. With its stunning cinematography and gorgeous scene, this well acted acculturation lesson is punctuated by a episode featuring some of the most beautiful creatures on Earth. Heavyweight Rider is the perfect family film and deserved to be a bigger hit.

4. DIRTY Pretty THINGS<br />Ill-gotten Pretty Things is the best pictorial matter of the year that many of you may never make even heard of. Director Stephen Frears (Dangerous Liaisons, High Fidelity) fashioned this Hitchcockian thriller/drama about an upscale Greater London Hotel that harbors a bizarre black market ring. The film is expertly crafted with midget doses of black comedy that ne’er go o’er the top; but Pestiferous Pretty Things strongest dimension is a brilliant, heartbreaking turn by Chiwetel Ejiofor, who, along with Bank bill Murray in Lost in Translation, gave the best performance by an actor in 2003. Amelie star Audrey Tautou plays against type as a Turkish immigrant.

3. SEABISCUIT<br />As I watched Gary Ross magical Seabiscuit, I couldnt help merely get a lump in my throat. Beautifully acted by everyone involved, this wonderful moving-picture show is lots more than a sports film. This depiction of four characters who would profoundly impact each others lives during the Smashing Depression is incredibly uplifting and very inspirational. Further proof that summer movies dont have to hold things that go &quot;BOOM!&quot; to be effective.

2. FINDING NEMO<br />Those guys over a Pixar really are amazing. I wouldnt call Finding Nemo the best of Pixars efforts (I love the Toy Story films), but I would call it the best looking. The underwater vistas in this sinful family/adventure lend themselves attractively to computing device animation. This film is also perfectly cast featuring the voices of a hilarious Prince Albert Brooks and a zany Ellen DeGeneres. Like the best of Disney animated features, Finding Nemo doesnt shy aside from serious subject issue (the loss of a parent here is quite devastating), and like Disneys best, this picture doesnt merely appeal to children, but sooner the child in all of us. This ocular splendor dazzles with a story that transends old age barriers.

1. LORD OF THE Rings: RETURN OF THE King<br />It may be a tad pretentious to call Return of the King the charles Herbert Best film of the class given that so many other plastic film fans and critics have done the same, so…Im sledding to call it the best moving-picture show of the year anyway. Is this movie perfect? Of course not, simply no other movie this year affected me quite a the same way this one did, and when it was over, I was severe pressed to pick which of the three I like the best (specially after experiencing all trey in a row, during Trilogy Tuesday). Now, I sort of view it as one glorious larger-than-life - but the way Peter Capital of Mississippi and his fearless crew intended. I honestly believe that these films get raised the bar for movie-making. The passion and effort that went into this series is unmated and the greatest deception of all is that the characters never got lost in the outpouring of unbelievable special personal effects work. The Lord of the Rings series, like the books, will go down in history as classic movie theatre. And tied though Cock Jackson was forced to compromise some of the material, he never lost the emotional state of Tolkiens beloved work. Long live the King and long live Mr. Jackson.

WORST OF 2003!

As usual, I wont bore you with a big old list of crap that I endured during 2003. I will reveal what I felt was the worst characterisation of the year. Actually, its tie.

BULLETPROOF Monastic<br />Chow Yun Fat is a major talent. Theres no uncertainty about it. Why American filmmakers have yet to exploit that talent is beyond me. Time and time once again, this terrific actor has appeared in one weak American drive after another. Some mediocre (see Anna and the King, The Corruptor) and some simply plain awe-inspiring (see The Replacement Killers). Chalk up another one in the awful family. Bulletproof Monk is so bad, I dont level know where to begin. Lets start with chemistry or the lack thereof. What friggin genius thought it would be cool to squad up Chow chow Yun Fat with Seann William Dred Scott? This was the worst idea in the history of big ideas. Plain, the producers of this movie thought that theyd be duplicating the illusion that Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker brought to Rush 60 minutes (overrated), or the interpersonal chemistry that Jackie Chan and Owen Wilson brought to Shanghi Noonday. Too bad this picture isnt remotely funny. Even the martial arts hocus-pocus is dull. What a waste of talent and money.

HOUSE OF THE DEAD<br />House of the Dead found new shipway to destroy the fine art of plastic film. This movie is scattered! This motion picture is total of regretful acting (save for a cameo by Clint Leslie Howard)! is moving-picture show isnt scary! This movie doesnt make sense! Did I citation that this movie is based on a video game? If you werent aware of this fact, you volition be patch you watch it (should you make up one’s mind to waste your valuable time). During the awfully conceived action scenes, they actually intercut clips directly from the game. House of the Dead is beyond awful. House of the Utter is…UBER AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2003 has come to an end, only we give birth 2004 to look forward to. At a glance, some of the movies Im most excited to see are The Passion of Christ of Christ, Spider-Man 2, Club Apprehension, Anchorman, The Aviator, Hellboy, and, of course, Lord of the Rings: The Complete Prolonged Trilogy (regular if I do receive to have it on a drilling old television set).

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

Apocalypto makes it official. Mel Althea Gibson is a madman. Peradventure not the madman that hilarious South Park episode made him out to be (suggesting that Mary Martin Riggs likes to finger paint with his own poop testament go low-spirited in history as one of the funniest things Ive of all time seen), still Mel is a little bit kooky. Not that calling Gibson a lunatic is an insult. Far from it, Sugar Tits. Actually, Mr. Gibson stiff a passionate film maker with a true eye for the hypnotic. Spell his latest epic lacks the closeness of Man Without a Face, the emotional underpinning of Braveheart, and the unflinching brutality of The Passion of the Jesus Christ, it clay an extremely entertaining action picture and benefits from a hyper kinetic tempo.

As Apocalypto opens, were introduced to a humble Mayan federation of tribes. They are a passive people and live off the woods as their ancestors did before them. One sunrise, a danton True Young tribesman, Panthera onca Paw (Rudy Youngblood), is awakened by rustling right outside the village. Without warning, his people and their homes are overwhelmed by a hostile (and massive) Mayan tribe. Many of the men and women of this settlement are massacred, while others are taken as electric potential slaves.

Before being taken, Jaguar Paw manages to lead his pregnant wife and child to safety. The only question is, how long will they remain out of harms way? This haunts young Jaguar Hand as he and the rest of his captive tribe are dragged through the jungle, towards an unknown goal. Throughout his ordeal, the burning desire to be restored to his family is the only thing that occupies his thoughts.

I was somewhat surprised by Apocalypto. It wasnt quite what I view it would be. Particularly the number one thirty proceedings, when were introduced to Jaguar Manus and his fellow tribesman. Theyre almost childlike and frat-boyish in the way they play pranks on one some other. Gibson deceptively introduces us to a world that is quite a innocent, just he does so in order that he mightiness unexpectedly discharge the hammering in a big way not but ten minutes later. In one case the plot is set into motion, and Panther Paws greenwich Village comes under siege, Apocaplyto becomes a hypnotic, hair-raising, odyssey into a public I dont think Ive ever seen in a movie in front.

As Panthera onca Paw is taken from his peace-loving way of life, he comes face to fount with a world hes never really known. Hes witness to strange, mythic mumbo gargantuan (some of which is chillingly delivered by a sickly child), forced to view dreaded, satanic rituals, and plunged into near death experiences on several occasions, and I was never whole sure where all of this lunacy was headed.

The tone here is gritty but its punctuated with a perverse sense of humor, not different the workings of Mel Gibsons honest-to-goodness friend, director George Miller (Mad Max, Road Warrior, etc.). Not surprisingly, the film is simply sensational to see at. Gibson has a meticulous eye for item. Essentially, this movie is about a culture that has been dead for many, many years, only that doesnt stop Frantic Mel from doing painstaking research. Apocalypto is shot in the Mayan accent (with Side subtitles), and the locations, Art Guidance, Cinematography, and Costume Plan are breathless, as ar most of the performances. Many of these actors (including magnetic lead Rudy Youngblood) ar newcomers, and all ar effective.

Theres been a lot of talk around the vehemence in this picture. Yes, it is extremely bloody, but this is a movie for adults. Apocalypto is, after all, portraying a wild world. So, be prepared for chest stabbings, hearts being ripped from bodies, decapitations, and a Felis onca attack that will depart your adrenalin spiked long after its ended.

While Apocalypto does make a statement about a new beginning coming out of the termination of an old way of life (a base also explored to more dramatic burden in, say, Dances With Wolves), it is, at its eye, an action movie. To the highest degree notably in the second base half as Jaguar Hand frantically makes his way back to his family while being pursued by a pack of hostile Mayan warriors. At this point, the movie becomes a visceral assault of the senses, as Panthera onca Paw uses all his knowledge of the forest to fight off his enemies (think Predator).

Braveheart was one of my favorite films of the 90s. Yes, it was an highly violent motion picture, but it was also a story about passion. Everything William Wallace did in that film, he did out of beloved. Love for his slain soul mate, and beloved for his countrymen. Apocalypto follows a similar track at times, but more often than not, Panther Paw acts on pure instinct. Hes out to survive. Hes managed to emerge from a kind of Mayan version of Survivor, and at the end of his venture (an unexpected but entirely acceptable climax), he realizes theres always a larger fish. At that place really arent a lot of unplumbed points to be made in Apocalypto. If on that point is ane, I suppose thats it. Mostly though, this moving-picture show is around the chase and with good old Mel behind the photographic camera, you have it away they action is going to be first pace – and it is.

Gibson has had a turbulent twelvemonth to say the least, and while I dont condone some of his off screen antics, he remains an extremely ardent film manufacturing business, and thats why I go to see his movies. With the mesmerizing, action jammed Apocalypto, hes once again whisked me away on a sorcerous mystery tour of a breathtakingly dreamlike and enigmatic landscape. And while this isnt precisely the strongest effort of his calling, its silent grand entertainment.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

Saw II has arrived just in time for Halloween, an amazing exploit given that the first film opened less than a year ago. Non so awing is the technical quality of the movie. Its clear that the picture was fast tracked. Still, Saw II is on par with its forerunner. On some levels, its better (piece hardly a tour de force of virtuoso playacting, not one performance daunted me closely as much as Carey Elwes did in the first image) while on others, its not up to snuff (the twisty carnage here isnt as imaginative as it was in the first - save for a funk inducing chronological succession featuring a pit full of syringes).

To be completely honest, I wasnt overwhelmed by the first movie. Trusted, I idea it had fantastic moments (how canful you non like that twist), just overall, I felt the overacting and underdeveloped characters kept that film from being everything it could be. Saw II doesnt exactly go out of its way to rectify the problems with the first picture show, but its still more than clever than your average horror film.

In Proverb II, psycho mastermind Reciprocating saw (a terrific Tobin Alexander Melville Bell) returns for another go around, this time with hot headed cop Eric Matthews (played by Donnie Wahlberg), and a radical of six-spot strangers wHO awake to find themselves trapped in a dark and dirty house with a maze-like structure. Chop-chop, Matthews learns that even though he isnt apart with these particular strangers, that his situation is just as dire, peradventure even more than so.

Like the original film, Saw II (as was the case with the low picture) sort of plays like a sick and twisted game of Subsister. The contestants on display in this sequel are thrown into some sincerely diabolical scenarios (one in particular actually made my skin crawl), but with the exception of the aforementioned, none of these survival tests were as gripping as the torturous, cruel tests created for the first picture. And in fact, one test is really duplicated for this followup. It features a sort of genus Venus fly snare contraption hooked to a mans head. If he is ineffective to find a key to unlock the piece of machinery before the timer runs out…well…you get the idea. A similar scenario is played to stronger force in the original photographic film, but I must read, it is a stroke of flair where Jigsaw hides the key this time around.

The genesis of the screenplay is fairly interesting. The initial story wasnt written as a Saw film simply Lions Logic gate purchased the rights and brought Sawing machine screenwriter Vivien Leigh Whannell on board to twist and shape the story structure around the Saw mythology. The last product is familiar and includes little winks to other works of horror including a perfectly placed nod to Wes Cravens Last Firm on the Left.

The performances here are highly weak with the exception of Tobin Bell, a terrific part actor world Health Organization takes the Jigsaw fibre to new heights. Bell is granted a more than meaty role this time, and were even given a little back floor on wherefore he does what he does. Wahlberg is sub par as detective Matthews. A shame given his exceptional operate on the short lived TV series Boomtown. I suppose I like his bursts of anger, simply his few scenes of breakdown are hardly effective. One moment in particular features a distraught Matthews getting teary eyed. For whatever grounds, I immediately pictured the film makers turning off the television camera and throwing some capsicum annuum longum pepper in his case so he could rupture up (a similar technique Im positive they secondhand on comrade Mark in Four Brothers). He just didnt sell it at all. The cast of strangers wHO struggle to survive in the house are scarcely worth mentioning as they arent really characters at all. Of the raw potential victims, Shawnee Smith is the only reverting cast member from the first moving picture, and shes absolutely horrified at the thought of going through another matchless of Jigsaws gruesome games. Thankfully, as awful as a few of the performances ar here, none of them reach the overacting depths of the inept Carey Elwes in the low picture. Granted, this picture show moves at such a quick clipping, that in that respect isnt clip to brood upon whatsoever of them long sufficiency to tolerate this to happen. Thank God for that.

In terms of style, Saw II is amateurish and chalk full of that awful euphony video dash editing that I cunt about so much on this web site, but oddly, I didnt hate the movie. It isnt whatsoever better or any worsened than the first picture. Many of the things that daunted me more or less the last outing (Carey Elwes, the unnecessary Danny Glover character etc.) ar nowhere to be launch. On the other deal the trinket and cleverly perverse tone brought on by the torture devices in Saw dont work as comfortably here. They just arent as inventive. Still, the movie moves at a nice sufficiency pace, and I cant say that I was ever completely bored by it.

Oh, and did I happen to mention that theres a twist? While it isnt the doozy that Saw had to offer, it is sensible sufficiency given Jigsaws terminal status. Without gift too a good deal away, lets just enunciate that the outcome here makes much more gumption if youve seen the first picture show.

Saw II is scarcely a re-invention of the genre. It owes the world to the likes of Sevener and Usual Suspects but hell, what movie doesnt borrow from another film, especially in the horror genre. This flick was clearly fast tracked so that it would make its Halloween weekend opening and the rushed production values certainly show through. Still, if you liked the get-go picture, this one should be correct up your alley. Its more of the same.

Not as good as the first-class honours degree to be sure - but still I was on the edge of my ass the whole time through the continuation so it must have been pretty good

I wish I were old enough to see this film in theaters. I guess Ill just have to be patient role and await for it to come out on video.

Not nearly as gruesome or clever, but then over again Cary Elwes remained dead. You gotta count your blessings.

Before the screening of Saw 2, I caught the trailer for Hostel. Today Im no great fan of Eli Roth (although this is an sentiment based alone on Cabin Fever) which was a passable film if it was intended as a comedy and nothing more. But Ive got to admit Im more than intrigued by what I saw in the trailer for his new one. It will be interesting to find just how audacious Philip Roth is, because this is a picture show with a potential to be absolutely wicked. Supposedly its based on true events about a site that offers sickos the opportunity to torture individual for a high toll. You have to admit that such a preface has a world of cringe-inducing promise. If you have any more information on the film - release dates etc. Id be concerned in determination out more than.

Saw is the to the highest degree amzing celluloid ever, i have ne’er been to a photographic film and was actually activated before it even started!!!!! BEAT THAT!!!!!

Dude I saw that trailer myself and if totally gave me the shivers. I cant fifty-fifty imagine such a thing being based on truth, but I guess they say that its alien than fiction. Personally I thought they gave away a small too much in the trailer. The bit with the pedicure seemed a bit to revalatory, but then again it makes you wonderment what genial of shit they didnt show?

Jason,

I couldnt agree more than with you on your opinion of Cabin Fever. Still, I enjoy observation Eli Philip Milton Roth speak. He clearly has a outstanding love for the genre and I hope Youth hostel proves to be a stepping rock. As for its release, it was initially set for December. 21st (Christmastide weekend–God sanctify Lions Gate), but has since been changed to early January. Cant wait to see it.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

This film could have been more appropriately highborn Midnight Summing up, as this action picture has rather a bit in unwashed with a certain Robert<br />DeNiro/Charles Grodin flick. Simply then that particular movie was much better than this peerless.

In The Rundown, The Rock plays Beck, a bounty hunter who desperately wants proscribed of his field. The bulky tough guy is forced to embark on one last job; find Travis (played by Seann William Scott), a smart ass wHO now resides<br />somewhere in the Amazon River Jungle, and bring him back to the states. Not surprisingly, there are many obstacles standing in Becks way including a ruthless baddie played with typical vehemence by the spectacular Christopher Walken.

In all honesty, I went into this movie ready to hatred it. The trailer is positively dreadful and the footage I saw at ShoWest last March didnt make the film look any bettor. Thankfully, The Rundown isnt complete garbage. It sure enough isnt Tough Boys 2 bad. Unfortunately, the moving-picture show isnt all that memorable either.

Lets talk just about what does work. The Rock does emerge as a true action maven here. He definitely has the talent and charisma to be &quot;the next big thing.&quot; While its perfectly clear up that he has the look for this kind of picture show, it should also be noted that he isnt a half bad thespian and even shows a bit of a knack for comic delivery. Hes come a long fashion from the WWF. In The Summing up, he makes his character far more interesting than he should have been.

As good as The Rock is, Christopher Walken steals every scene hes in which isnt at all surprising. There is a instant in this movie in which hes trying to explain things to a group of locals world Health Organization dont sympathise English. Walkens determination and reactions are priceless.

I also really enjoyed Rosario Dawson wHO seems a good deal more gifted than her choice in roles would suggest. Shes engaging and quite beautiful and I can only hope that she takes her talent to the next level in the upcoming epical<br />Alexander.

Sadly, The Summation doenst hold much else to bid. Some of the action sequences are quite electrifying, most notably the one in which The Rock-and-roll and George C. Scott take a tumble down a rather large pot. But at that place is way too much of that &quot;fighting for the sake of fighting&quot; kind of hooey that has a path of making an audience drowsy.

Seann William Dred Scott is essentially doing what he always does, only hes toned it down a pass. He too takes every opportunity to pull off his<br />shirt, no question trying to prove that hes practically more than a laughable actor. What really bothered me was the deficiency of alchemy between he and The Rock. As was the case with Scott and Chow Yun Fat in the dreadful Bulletproof Thelonious Sphere Monk, Scott and The Rock and roll somehow carry off to be lesser than the sum of the parts.

Director Peter Berg (a man primarily known for performing in everything from Wes Cravens Shocker to TV.s Windy City Hope) does keep the energy level up. The Rundown is fast and furious and extremely light on its toes. The early moments of the picture are very entertaining as The Rock enters a nox club where he must engage in business with an entire NFL football game team. The<br />sequence is preceded by one of the funniest cameos Ive seen in quite one-time. I dont want to give anything away, so let me just pronounce that the torch has been passed. At the very least, this is a stair above Bergs critically panned Very Bad Things, and the film maker even has a good sufficiency sense of humor to make a joke at that movies expense.

The movie rattling fails because of repetition. Many of the action at law sequences begin to recur themselves, and most of the hand-to-hand combat scenes look the same. Add to this the familiarity of the material and the deficiency of<br />chemistry between The Rock and Scott and you get a film that just never in truth comes together.

I wouldnt say I hated this movie. I watched it with The Boneman and he sure as shooting didnt like it. (Then again that fruity bastard liked The Hours) I<br />thought it had its moments. Id also have to say that The Rock could quite possibly be on his way to a big film career. Hopefully, the sporadically entertaining The Rundown is a simple stepping rock to something bigger and better.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

In New York (circa 1876), Leopold (Hugh Jackman) is an English Duke whose uncle (Paxton Milium) is pressuring him to marry a wealthy woman in rules of order to ensure the financial well-being of the family unit - in order that they power continue to live in the way in which theyve become accustomed. On the eve of his thirtieth natal day, the openhanded and highly prized Third Duke of Albany (Jackman) is scheduled to announce his fiancee. But during the party thrown for this very purpose, Leopold spots an odd-looking unknown (Liev Schreiber) whom hed seen earlier that day at a gala for the opening of the Brooklyn Bridge. Struck by the odd coincidence Leopold leaves the bevy of potential brides and pursues this occult fellow. His pursuit takes him on a frenzied dash and a climb up the Brooklyn Bridge and earlier you can say H.G. Wells, Shreiber has traveled back to modernistic day New York and unfortunately for him has brought along a Duke.

As it turns stunned Jackman is Shreibers great-great grandfather world Health Organization is still wearing his dress wearing apparel from the party which makes him look care Sergeant Pepper. Quite alas for many of the residents of the Boastful Apple Leopold also happens to be the man who invented the elevator. The 2 time travelers make a bit of a disturbance in Shreibers apartment, hence his ex-girlfriend Kate McKay (Meg Ryan), who lives in the apartment exactly beneath his, decides to investigate and as you might conceive of this is the number 1 time the title characters have occasion to meet. Ryan is accustomed to Shreibers data-based tinkering, but is quite taken aback to find that unrivaled of her exs inventions actually kit and boodle. And is astonished and somewhat nonplused as Shreiber explains that hes set up a hole in the time-space continuum and incidentally brought gage his great grandfather, Count Leopold, the Third Duke of Albany

James Mangel-wurzel (Girl Off-and-on) directs this time-travel wild-eyed comedy, with a light and deft touch. With only a week left to return Leopold to 1876, Shreiber has his work cut out for him. In the meantime, Mangold has a good time with this peculiar fish-out-of-water story - in particular as he contrasts the manners that have changed so drastically over a century and a half. Jackman plays the charming gentleman from Victorian England to a tee, and goodness is he stunned at the lifestyle of twenty-first 100 Americans world Health Organization have no time for the comforts of life. Gone is tea-time, the culinary arts, or anything that passes for romantic etiquette.

Leopold is peculiarly fascinating to Kates sidekick Charlie (Breckin Meyer), an actor, wHO hasnt fared very well with the opposite sex and allows Leopold to tutor him in the proper way of life to arrest a womans attention. His romance and chivalry has just as big an impact on those about him as the sudden absence of elevators experience on the citizens of New House of York. Kates boss is a bit of a cure who expects a little lovin in return for the bring forward that she deserves and has awaited for a long meter. This situation is sorted out by the no-nonsense Old School gent, world Health Organization shows up just in time to thwart the untoward advances of Kates boss (Tom Bradley Whitford) whom he reveals to be both a braggart and a heel. Mangold level goes so far as to receive his time-traveling hero retrieve Kates purse from a thief which he manages in short horseback chase through Cardinal Park.

The reason Mangold goes to such lengths to impress is because Ryan is in one of those stages she gets herself into where shes tending up on love in favor of absolute centering on her job. She looks at romance and relationships with a jaundiced eye bordering on celibacy. And her less crinkly-nosed-cute turn here makes for a credible, stressed-out career woman. Playing the jaded world-weary object of desire, against Jackmans sincere innocence sets both up for a pot of magic moments. The film works equally intimately as a light clowning as it does a think-piece of a love story.

Hugh Jackman is a enrapture as Leopold, the perfect gentleman whos a example of urbanity and civility so desperately missing from our multiplication. In the end, his earnest good, wit and many kindnesses do get a positive impact on Kate, the worn-out workaholic. She is forced — like the character she played in Joe Versus the Volcano — to make an enormous life-altering leap of faith. This is a film that took a lot of chances from a plausibleness standpoint, merely the exuberant performance by Jackman, a fun turn by Brackin Meyer and a solid effort by Ryan make it work despite all that it asks from the audience.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

During the madness that is the Sundance Film Festival, I somehow managed to find the clock time to take in a midnight screening of this much talked about flick from J.J. Abrams.

Has the new monster movie Cloverfield re-invented the genre as we know it? Does it hot up to the tremendous hype that began generating back in July with the going of that brilliant trailer? Is this the move picture event of the decade? These are questions flowing through many a movie geeks head. For my money this isnt the indorsement coming of the classical monster pic, but it is an incredibly entertaining roller coaster ride.

2007 saw the release of two similarly themed films. In The Mist, a group of survivors band together to elude a slew of strange creatures unleashed by a military experiment at peace horribly faulty. In I Am Legend, Will David Roland Smith plays a man battling rabid mankind in an eerily deserted New York City. Like the Mist over, Cloverfield has a wight(s) at the tenderness of its story and as was the subject in I Am Caption, this is also a story of survival in the Gravid Apple.

As Cloverfield opens, a chemical group of attractive twenty somethings throw a going away party for a champion whos around to leave behind for and important job opportunity in Japan. At the crowded get together, one of the party goers, a shy clown name Department of Housing and Urban Development, is assigned the task of tV taping leave-taking messages. The party is abruptly cut short when a microseism violently rattles the apartment. Scared and unsure of whats occurrent, these panic-stricken twenty somethings ascend to the rooftop and quickly realize that what they just experient wasnt an earthquake at all. In the distance, there are inexplicable explosions one of which sends fiery dust hurtling toward them. Rather than falling the camera, Hud realizes that this pending catastrophe needs to be authenticated, so he leaves the camera running.

Whats in truth great about Cloverfield is that it takes an idea thats been done to death and manages to breathe life into it. Dead on target, the hand-held camera work and massive monster violent disorder might lead one to simply call this picture show Blair Wiccan meets Godzilla, but theres much more to Cloverfield than its 50s B-movie mentality and the gimmicky hand held camera cultivate.

Cloverfield uses its preface (the entire film seen through the lens of an amateur video camera) to its fullest vantage. This style really adds to the intimacy of the transactions, and it isnt as nausea-inducing as you mightiness suspect - although I wouldnt urge you sit around in the front row.

The special effects ar outstanding, and they never really suit the centrepiece of the film. This is a big, monster movie and it does offer up a just share of awe-inspiring visuals, but director Matt Reeves wisely uses the effects as a tool to help assure the tarradiddle, but never allows them to become the tale. Again, all the personal effects shots are from the point of view of Huds tv camera. As he and his small band of friends frantically move through the streets of New House of York looking for a safe haven, we get just mere glimpses of the colossal tool wreaking mayhem and gradually feeds the audience larger doses as the film proceeds. Reeves subscribes to the &quot;what you dont see is scarier than what you do see&quot; theory of monster movie devising, and it serves the film unbelievably well. Just take heart creature feature article fans, we do fix to see the savage in its entirety, and when the monster is finally revealed, it is a moment of pure and give tongue to terror.

Cloverfield isnt all perfect. At that place are a few moments that ar slightly overacted and audiences will but have to accept the fact that Hud would be so determined to document this big time disaster, rather than falling the tv camera out of sheer panic.

Having aforesaid that, this is an immensely entertaining movie and it avoids many of the cliches that in the main come with the territory. Cloverfield isnt interested in giving half assed explanations. We never find out where this monster comes from. In that location is a moment in the plastic film when a key case spews obvious theories around the origins of the beast, simply Cloverfield doesnt dwell on such business sector. Reeves and his team simply insert us to these characters, and once we know them easily enough to care just about their wellbeing, he throws them into peril. This is a survival history and where it ends up, mightiness upset occasional movie goers. There is a kind of September 11 inspired grotesqueness to the tone of the flick, and it is a little upsetting. In the end though, this is a advantageously paced creature feature with wonderfully intense sequences, vainglorious time scares, a grouping of characters worth lovingness about, and a teras worthy of the plug its generating.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

Four Feathers is one of those pictures that seemed to come out of nowhere. I dont think I heard a thing about it until a month ago. This is strange given the movies great scope and the interest of Elizabeth I director Shekhar Kapur.

In the period piece, Heath Ledger plays a British soldier readying himself for war. When his troops are called off to battle, he opts to resign from the military, and or else focus on his relationship with his fiance (played by Kate Hudson.) This prompts his closest friends and fellow soldiers to send him four feathers, a rough sign of cowardice. Unable to header with feelings of guiltiness and confusion, Ledger sets out to prove his worth non only to those world Health Organization have turned their backs on him, but to himself.

Ledger becomes more comfortable with each passage movie, and in Quatern Feathers, he really seems at ease and is able to hold his own against a cast of thousands. Wes Bentley (American Beauty) is fifty-fifty better as Ledgers good friend and fellow soldier. While at the surface he may seem sooner bland, thither is practically there if you look deep. Bentley really adds depth to this grand character.

Kate Hudson appears in a rather thankless, minor role as the love interest. However, she has a smile that lights up the screen and she won me over. The standout operation comes from Djimon Hounsou (Amistad, Gladiator) as a slave world Health Organization ultimately befriends Ledger. This is what the supporting player is all about. Hounsou is extremely magnetic, and he steals every scene hes in with power and conviction.

Four Feathers does have major flaws. It isnt particularly well written in price of plot of ground structure. I found myself questioning the motivation of various characters in the picture. Its hard to elaborate farther without gift things away, so Ill just leave it at that. The final work of this movie is very slow and a tad involved. Hounsou reappears out of nowhere after being absent for a portion of the motion picture. However, Quaternion Feathers does pick up the stride, ending with an excited wallop involving a reunion of 2 of the films principal characters.

Kapur obviously had his hands full with the massive scope of Four Feathers, and piece its hardly executed to perfection, theres enough here to recommend, be it the unassailable performances or the breathtaking cinematography.

I also admire Kapur for having faith in his audience. He doesnt repair to flashbacks and other such devises to get certain points across. He just tells the story in a straight forward fashion.

I doubt that Four Feathers will be remembered derive the feverish awards season, but its still a film I admire for many reasons, none bigger than a energetic supporting turn by Djimon Hounsou.

This flick was far too long and slow. I like the people in the film, although I recollect Hudson was miscast, but again the film was too long and the payoffs too weak, this film would have profited from a zealous redaction.

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

With names like Michelle Pfieffer, Sir Rex Harrison Ford, and director Henry Martyn Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future and Forrest Gump) involved in a project, youd consider youd have an inst winner on your manpower. Unfortunately, thats not the case with this new suspense thriller.

Claire (Pfeiffer) spends most of her time dangling around her house with not often to do since her daughter has left for college. Her husband Jessye Norman (Ford) loves her merely is quite consumed with work. To pass time, Claire becomes fixated on her neighbors strange habits. After suspecting that her neighbors wife has been murdered, she begins to notice peculiar goings on around the house. Doors creaking, strange whispering, footsteps–poor Claire. In front long, she realizes that shes suit the target of a full scale haunting and, wouldnt you know it, everyone Claire confides this to, thinks sheÕs up in the night.

As youve plausibly heard, closely every critic in the free world has goddamn the marketing of this picture, alleging that Dreamworks has apt away most of the films surprises in the trailers and ads. Although these previews did throw away role of the plot, my complaint with What Lies Beneath is that it pretty much sucked.

Robert Zemeckis is one of our very best directors. Hes an inventive, technical wizard wHO can besides excel with drama when hes at the big top of his game. What Lies Below is slick but slick does not a well movie make. Its ane thing to pay court and some other to blatantly rip off, and much of Zemeckis imagery in this flick seems to be immediately lifted from the passe-partout of suspense, Alfred Alfred Hitchcock. But Zemeckis doesnt stopover there. Not only does this film seem to resemble classics, it too tips its hat to highly mediocre fare such as Deceived and Quiescency With The Enemy.

The biggest problem with this problem-fest of a film was the painfully slow set-up that lasts over an hour. To top that turned, most of the scares in the film dont stem from character or situations. Most are cheap-tactic scares such as sudden phone gang or a cats suddenly jumping on window ledges.

Pfeiffer is looking as beautiful as ever. She also possesses a talented screaming voice. She adds more goodwill than this film deserves. Ford goes out on a limb with parts of this character just isnt all that effective. Some of the best moments in the pic involve supporting players Princess of Wales Scarwid as Claires friend and Joe Morton as a psychiatrist. But they were minded precious little screen-time.

The bottom line is that What Lies Beneath is so calculated in its execution, that it simply isnt shivery. When Claire is lento walking backward down her stairway and doesnt trouble oneself to look behind her, what do you retrieve is exit to bump? What Lies Beneath is full of moments like these. And aside from a horrifyingly intense scene that takes place in a tub, I never felt like any of these characters were in any hazard and I certainly didnt care. Even the twists in the plot (and there is a bonny share of them) were at best uneventful.

What Lies At a lower place is variety of The Sixth Horse sense meets Fatal Attraction. Merely The Sixth Sense had a strong emotional core and plot twists that the interview had no reason to expect. And certainly Fateful Attraction offered a a good deal more temperature reduction tale about the woes of matrimonial infidelity. Unhappily, with dreadfully written rip-off of a film, Zemeckis has created his biggest misfire. Up next for Mr. Zemeckis is Draw Away with Tom Hanks. If the trailer to the coming Christmas release is whatsoever indication, Zemeckis has full recovered.

Ill tell you what lies beneath - a septic tank and the rotting corpse of a

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »

I take to intromit that I am a huge fan of Cristal Sandler. Of all his films, Small Nicky and The Waterboy are the only deuce I didnt give favorable reviews to. I was pretty excited for Ire Management. Not only for Sandler, merely for Jack Nicholson as well. I mean Sandler and Nicholson in the same plastic film? It had to be good, didnt it? The trailers deliver been screaming, and the two stars are just off some of their best work (Punch Drunk Love for Sandler and About Helmut Heinrich Waldemar Schmidt for Nicholson). There was no way this moving picture could draw.

Sadly, this is a film that is mediocre at best. It certainly isnt aweful like Slight Nicky, just it isnt as systematically funny as his better stuff.

In the forcemeat, Sandler plays a edward Young man wHO, on an extraordinarily bad day, gets sent to an angriness management session run by a doctor (Jack Nicholson) known for his unusual techniques. Earlier long, Nicholson is rooming with Sandler in an attempt to weed-out all those tight anger demons. In his words, &quot;Your anneal is the only thing you cant control by losing it.&quot;

Sandler doesnt bet on an annoying idiom and hes surprisingly soft throughout most of the film. Its everything round him failed so signally. Jack Nicholson is….well…Jack Nicholson. This is one of those movies in which the oldtimer actors trademark arched eyebrow and roguish grin are on total display. Marisa Tomei as well appears as Sandlers loving girlfriend, and it was amusing observation her yield to Nicholsons charms.

Anger Management as well boasts a notable cameo roster that includes; John Turturro, King John C. Reilly, Heather Graham, Woody Harrelson, and Kevin Nealon..

Sadly, this stellar cast doesnt add up to a whole heck of a lot because the introduce just isnt strong sufficiency to adjudge up for 90 proceedings. Sure, Ire Management has funny moments. You cant help just smile when Sandler and Nicholson whistle &quot;I Feel Pretty&quot; while stuck in a traffic block. Unfortunately, end-to-end I ground myself working on my issues of Boredom Management.

Mostly, this film just serves up one absurd, over-the-top situation after some other, as Sandler becomes progressively angry spell trying to tame his rage. And while the movie does have an explanation for each ridiculousness, that is perhaps the most derisory aspect of the film. I dont want to give anything away, simply as I watched this, I couldnt help but be reminded of a certain David Fincher film.

Anger Management is sporadic at best. It surely offers up laughs, just it lacks the energy and consistent humor of Happy Gilmore, the complete charm of Wedding Isaac Bashevis Singer, and the depth of Punch Drunk Love. Sandler is stringently out to entertain and I can respect that. Sadly, he and Nicholson cant manage to acquire this one joke moving-picture show to a higher level.

I think if I read another review where you employment the expression &quot;periodically entertaining&quot; I think Im going to hurl. True, this picture show was not consistently strong, but Sandlers performance was consistently right. And since this is basically an Adam Sandler movie, I think it deserves a better target. Ive seen this pic several times and it just keeps getting punter, I would suggest you give it another chance.

Hi at that place,

Im good-for-naught my victimization the term &quot;sporadically entertaining&quot; makes you want to hurtle. As for the flick, it was nowhere near as singular as it could get been. Im a Sandler fan, but this moving picture was banal. It isnt Little Nicky bad, just its a far cry out from the likes of Happy Gilmore, Billy Capital of Wisconsin and Marriage ceremony Singer. And given that Sandler is capable of something as deep as Punch-Drunk Love, makes Choler Management appear like an even larger mis-step. I didnt like 50 First base Dates either but I liked it more than this film. Im glad you enjoyed it though. To each his/her have. By the way, I did watch it a second time and felt the same way.

Nicolson and Sandler played off each other magnificantly - I think this flick will be appreciated long after the critics take had their say

Anger Management was peculiar, and dozens betta than The Wedding Singer and Sandlers ova movies! i liked it

Dave Buznik is a balmy mannered kind of guy that lets the unanimous world walk all over him. He has been doing his bosses job for five-spot years with no regard or reference for any of the work he has been doing. When his knob finally gives him a chance to showcase himself by sending him to St. Louis on a business trip this is Daves fortune to eventually shine and hopefully bring a new executive promotion that just opened. Only when there is a misunderstanding on the plane where the flight attendants and a US marshal think Dave has kaput ballistic and he ends up organism jailed for the incident. When he goes to court he is told that he will have to hang anger management as percentage of his sentence. The course is being taught by Dr. Buddy Rydell an eccentric and rather unconventional doctor of the Church who had just happened to be sitting following to Dave during the flight. Just instead of just sign language Dave out of the course like he wanted to the good doctor actually moves in with him and begins to take all over his life. The doctor also introduces him to a mathematical group of rather crazy and angry of patients of his, and even assigns one of these crazies as his so-called choler ally. Dave who had had a very ordinary life before this as he was engaged to a beautiful woman Linda and a respectable job now finds all this in peril as the good dr. seems scheol bent on destroying everything in a pretense of healing him from and anger he never felt he had. So now Dave moldiness wither stand up for himself and try and escape from the clear insane doctor or find his life torn to shreds just nothing is as easy as that as anything that commode go wrong does and will.

I really wanted to like this motion picture, as the story seemed one of the most unique I had heard of in years and I had been excited about its release. It seemed impossible that they could go wrong teaming up such great stars as Nicholson and Sandler in what had to be one of the funniest pretence of all times simply somehow and I cant tell you how because I am not sure how they screwed this movie up. Sure the movie is funny at times and I laughed quite hard at some of the funnier scenes but a lot of the picture was a trek through drudgery and plain giddiness. Maybe I have grown cynical because I remember laughing so hard at Happy Gillmore the beginning time I saw it that I was crying. This flick does not even come to half that level and just now seemed to be absent something. Sandler I believe is to be faulted as he just didnt seem to have the panache he once voiceless on the screen and trudge through a pile of his line and scenes. Nicholson seemed to also think that is crazy facial expressions could pull some of the scenes though their nuisance value rather than decent scripting and acting. Dont get me ill-timed I launch the moving-picture show funny and ingenious at times simply if failed to alive up to his selfsame high potentiality that could have made it one of the funniest movies of all time rather that a half asked job of a pic it was.

Action movies

Tags: Uncategorized // Add Comment »